The Christchurch plan is a big document. I have only scanned it and accept it is the first cut - and will be subject to change. But I believe the authors are to be congratulated for producing such a persuasive document, with so much input, in such a short time. I await the next stage with interest.
The points that particularly impressed me included:
1. The way the process engaged with the community. The circumstances clearly contributed to the level of interest, but it feels like there were some valuable inputs that have influenced the plan.
2. The height limit in the central area - provided it is based on urban quality, not concern for safety (because that would be accepting kneejerk responses as valid). This will come under a lot of pressure - but I believe it would be worth using compensating methods if the imposition creates a demonstrable loss. Think of the great cities of the world - Paris, Berlin, most of old London - the buildings are generally no more than 6 or 7 levels. It provides a 'human urban scale'. High rise can be confined to specific areas (like the Le Defence area of Paris).
3. The sensible commitment to light rail to create a link to Ilam - and the uban consequences. Christchurch lost a lot when the planners shifted the University - this is a very sensible way of re establishing the link.
There's lots more - but for now - all power to Christchurch!
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
